This is legislation is law which was brought about largely to deal with payment issues and disputes in the Construction industry.

Its complex legislation and if you followed my prior blogs and followed my guidance and you end up in having to rely on this legislation in an unfortunate position you end in a dispute, you would by all accounts to be able to account for yourself and hopefully settle any issues.

I never recommend having an appetite for going to Court but always prepare as if you were going to Court.

I mentioned previously in one of my blogs, a Contract is irrelevant and never needs to come out the draw once signed unless you need to rely on it.

Most projects, the contracts just gather dust, but when you need the Contract, boy do you wish to complied with it.

Herein I discuss high level details about the Housing, Grants and Regeneration Act, this is not exhaustive;

---

The Housing, Grants and Regeneration Act: What You Need to Know

The Housing, Grants and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGRA) is a UK law that aims to improve the payment and dispute resolution processes in the construction industry. It applies to all contracts for ‘construction operations’, which include a wide range of building and engineering works. The HGRA has been amended by the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009, which introduced some significant changes to the payment and adjudication rules. In this blog post, we will explore the pros and cons of the HGRA and its amendment, and how they affect the parties involved in construction projects.

The Pros of the HGRA

The HGRA has several benefits for the construction industry, such as:

• It ensures that payments are made promptly throughout the supply chain, by requiring the parties to agree on payment dates, amounts, and mechanisms. If the contract does not specify these details, the default provisions of the Scheme for Construction Contracts (the Scheme) will apply. The Scheme is a set of regulations that supplement the HGRA and provide fallback rules for payment and adjudication.
• It introduces a ‘fairer’ payment regime, by banning ‘pay when paid’ clauses, which make the payment to a subcontractor conditional on the payment from a higher-tier contractor or the employer. Such clauses are ineffective under the HGRA, unless the payer becomes insolvent. The HGRA also allows the payee to suspend its work in case of non-payment, after giving a notice to the payer.
• It makes adjudication more accessible for the resolution of disputes, by giving the parties the right to refer any dispute arising under a construction contract to adjudication at any time. Adjudication is a fast and cost-effective way of resolving disputes, as the adjudicator must give a decision within 28 days (or a longer period agreed by the parties). The decision is binding on the parties until the dispute is finally resolved by litigation, arbitration, or agreement. The HGRA also requires the parties to include an adjudication clause in their contract, or else the Scheme will apply.

The Cons of the HGRA

The HGRA also has some drawbacks for the construction industry, such as:

• It creates complexity and uncertainty in the payment process, by introducing new concepts and terminology, such as ‘payment notices’, ‘pay less notices’, and ‘final date for payment’. These terms are not defined in the HGRA, but in the Scheme, which may not reflect the commercial reality of the parties. The parties may also find it difficult to comply with the strict time limits and formalities imposed by the HGRA and the Scheme, especially in large and complex projects.
• It increases the risk of disputes and litigation, by giving the parties more opportunities to challenge the payment and adjudication decisions. For example, the payer may dispute the amount or validity of a payment notice or a pay less notice, or the payee may dispute the jurisdiction or impartiality of the adjudicator. The parties may also seek to enforce or challenge the adjudicator’s decision in court, which may prolong the dispute and increase the costs.
• It does not cover all types of construction contracts and operations, by excluding some engineering projects, such as mining, nuclear, and power generation, as well as contracts with residential occupiers. The HGRA also does not apply to contracts governed by the law of another country, even if the construction operations take place in the UK.

Conclusion

The HGRA and its amendment have brought some significant changes to the payment and dispute resolution processes in the construction industry. The HGRA has some advantages, such as ensuring prompt payment, introducing a fairer payment regime, and making adjudication more accessible. However, the HGRA also has some disadvantages, such as creating complexity and uncertainty in the payment process, increasing the risk of disputes and litigation, and not covering all types of construction contracts and operations. Therefore, the parties involved in construction projects should be aware of the implications of the HGRA and its amendment, and seek professional advice if necessary.

Warm regards

Brad

My Blog Joke: Two hunters are out in the woods when one of them collapses. He doesn’t seem to be breathing and his eyes are glazed. The other guy whips out his phone and calls the emergency services. He gasps, “My friend is dead! What can I do?” The operator says, “Calm down. I can help. First, let’s make sure he’s dead.” There is a silence; then a gun shot is heard. Back on the phone, the guy says, “OK, now what?”